fits the sustainable city model. A model in which the systemic approach to the
relationship between city, environment and its components: territory,
environment, population and economy prevails; however, this model proposes
its actions at a smaller scale level such as the neighborhood. The latter being
the preferred sphere of action because it is considered the basic territorial
unit in the city, where sustainable proposals will have a greater chance of
being applied and appropriated by its inhabitants, generating a greater
impact on the city.
The implementation of these public policies in the canton of La Libertad
requires instruments, methodologies, tools and instances of coordination,
information and strategies for their adequate execution, as indicated in the
reference guiding document. It is evident then to highlight, that among the
national development objectives Semplades, (2021) emphasizes in the second
axis, referred to the Economy at the service of society, the need to consolidate
the sustainability of the economic, social and solidarity system, boost
productivity and competitiveness for sustainable economic growth, develop
productive capacities and the environment, to achieve food sovereignty and
Good Living, aspects to consider in the proposal of a methodology for the
implementation of Local Agenda 21 in rural and urban communities of
Ecuador.
For Quiroga, (2019) urban sustainability is supported by five pillars:
compactness, complexity, energy efficiency, social cohesion and governance;
it refers to the Mediterranean compact and sustainable city that fits the
sustainable city model. Model in which the systemic approach of the
relationship between city and environment prevails, as well as its components:
territory, environment, population and economy; however, this model proposes
its actions at a smaller scale level such as the neighborhood.
According to Borja, (2019) states that urbanism must be balanced and
integrating, urban planning and management must be developed in such a
way that cities guarantee a balance between urban development and the
protection of historical, cultural and natural heritage, generating social
cohesion; thus avoiding a dispersed, fragmented and segregating urbanism,
which allows the city to become a non-city, as happens with the peripheries.
According to Monfort, (2020) urban sustainability indicators have been seen
as signals that mark the progress in achieving the objectives and goals set out
in the urban planning process, and allow relevant and timely decisions to be
made. Therefore, their role is important because they become magnitudes that
can be measured and interpreted in order to identify the behavior of society
in relation to the surrounding natural system.
According to Marquez, (2019) Indicators are considered as effective tools for
communicating complex processes in both social, political and economic
spheres; they are defined as identifiable and measurable characteristics of
cities that evaluate progress or setbacks in the sustainability process, whose
selection constitutes a technical and political choice of important consequences,
because these parameters serve as a guide for setting objectives and these,
in turn, become physical limits defined in measurable terms.
According to Urbano & Sánchez, (2018) sustainability requires solvent
indicators that allow detecting changes in natural dynamics or variations in